Tag: bernie sanders

  • Post Hoc, Ergo Cluster Hoc

    Everybody wants the rewards of hard work and due diligence, but most people only want the rewards, without doing the hard work and due diligence.

    This is reflected in non-solutions to political problems like term limits (it’s called VOTING; term limits only serve to ensure that if you do get a decent person in office they can’t stay there long enough to get much done), and specious “solutions” to avoidable problems, like expanding the Supreme Court to counter-act the impact of a bad appointment. The proper way to have dealt with that was years ago, by not electing someone who’s going to make bad appointments. The proper way to have dealt with THAT was to not put up with the so-called Democratic party shoving a status quo token candidate down our throats in the face of overwhelming support for a progressive reformist platform. That means you stop jumping on the bandwagon you’re told and worrying about whose “turn” it is, and start taking issue with your “democracy” being dictated from the top down.

    America has a bad habit of not bothering to try to do things right and then complaining and trying to find shortcut solutions when things go wrong, and that never has worked and never will. We have proven once that “just do what you’re told or else the eviler will win” ends up with the eviler winning anyway, and I have a bad feeling we’re about to do it again. I hope not, but I suspect this race is going to be close enough for Trump to try to throw it to the Supremes, counting on the result being in his favor because he’s effectively turned the Supreme Court into a partisan weapon. And still, you hear “but Hillary won by three million votes.” Horse hockey. She lost. She and her team know how the electoral college works just like Trump and his team did, and she got cocky and arrogant and so did a whole lot of her voters, who were expecting a coronation and got a coup. Ralph Malph could have beat Trump by three million votes; the spread should have been five times that at least, and you should have had an energized, progressive ticket all the way down to your county commissioners and mayoralities.

    [do_widget id=text-2]

    I’m sorry that’s not an easy pill to swallow, but this nonsense of waiting to get angry and do something until the damage has already happened is just that, nonsense. Hillary Clinton was a lazy, arrogant candidate who assumed right up until the returns started coming in on election night that she had everything in the bag, and that’s what cost her the election. Many of us KNEW that’s how it would play out, but the majority just did what they were told, didn’t ask questions when the primary was obviously rigged and public opinion manipulated to gain post-hoc validation for the DNC-sponsored pillory of Sanders, the more popular candidate *by far*. They deliberately disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of people, telegraphed far ahead of time that they were going to do what they wanted so there was no point in voting anyway, and then blamed the very people whose voices they silenced for their own incompetence, ineptitude, and hubris.

    We let them do the same in 2020, and it’ll be nothing but a miracle if things don’t play out more or less the same way, handing the country over to Trump for another four years, and thereby effectively ending American Democracy.

    We have got to learn to stand up when it matters. Why do black people have to die before the masses listen to what many of us have been saying for decades about the militarization and authoritarian over-reach of local police? Why do we have to wait until millions are facing eviction before we start railing against the whole stupid system that’s created six times as many empty houses as homeless people but we still find a way to convince ourselves the homeless deserve it? Why do we have to wait until millions are infected with a deadly and crippling virus before we get serious about reforming our broken, cruel, and ineffective for-profit health care system?

    [do_widget id=text-3]

    We humans love our comfort, and our addiction to it – to the point that we’ve damn near sacrificed our very existence just for the illusion of comfort – is killing us.  That is how we got to the point that a single 87 year old woman is nearly all that stands between us and totalitarianism.

    That is why I’m not always polite and smooth-talking about these things. My readers are unquestionably of a higher intellectual and ethical caliber than the majority, but it’s still up to you guys to keep the word spreading, to take the chance on hurting your nazi grandma’s feelings or telling your drunk Uncle Bob who thinks OAN is a news source to shut the hell up, and to make the realities unavoidably clear to those who continue trying to avoid them.

  • Why Is Sanders Running As A Democrat?

    (Somewhat ironically, a technical error prevented me from getting an archive of the first night with the “new set.”  I’ve embedded the livestream from Facebook here, but I’ve only got the last ten minutes locally and right now FB is not letting me download the video directly.  If/when I can get this archived on YouTube, I will.  For now, you can find it here:  https://www.facebook.com/144898762238389/videos/496311224370776).  Yes I know the audio’s out of sync.)

    Why is Bernie running as a Democrat?

    U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders takes the stage on the first night of the second 2020 Democratic U.S. presidential debate in Detroit, Michigan, July 30, 2019. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

    One of the most-often asked questions I see – or depending on who’s talking and what their purpose is, accusations – about Bernie Sanders is why he’s running on the Democratic ticket.  There are a number of reasons, some easier to see and obvious, some not so much.

    First and foremost, he’s running on the Democratic ticket because the two major parties have the process locked down and an independent candidate doesn’t have a chance in hell at winning.

    Now maybe – MAYBE – if he finds a way to get on the national ticket without the democratic party at this point, if they decide to keep playing to power, depending on how things go over the next couple of months – after all this work and in this time of great crisis that screams out with the voice of millions that the things Sanders has worked for must be done now, it’s not entirely outside the realm of possibility that he could win the electoral college as a write-in. He needs 270 votes.  9 states, for a total of 53 electors, don’t allow write-ins. 

    The rest – 483 – do, with various requirements.  In Michigan, for instance, you have to file a letter of intent by the beginning of September and have a list of electors.  Each of them must have been a resident of the congressional district for which they’re voting for one year, and a US citizen for ten. But right now I think the inclination of the campaign is to do everything possible to save the one remaining party structure that *could* be saved to energize a united President and Congress to get some things done.  Certainly that’s not the Republicans, so the Dems are what’s left.

    But in the end, Bernie’s allegiance is to this country, not a party.  How that will lead him to decide the best way to pursue this situation, I don’t know.  I think if he made sure to dot his I’s and cross his T’s he could be an eligible write-in candidate. Depending on how many districts in which he can win the popular vote at that point, he’s got a margin of 213 electoral votes to work with.

    But in the end his allegiance is to doing the right thing for the people of this nation.  He’s entirely uncorrupted by special interests.

    That’s. Why. The. Party. Doesn’t. Want. Him. To. Win.

    That’s why the power that props the party up, including all the media companies who make all the big campaign donations, do not want him to win.

    That is why it does not require a conspiracy. The big money interests, including those who control most of the information you see, do not want a healthy, educated population. Having a healthy, educated population creates opportunity for you which means it creates competition for them in an “open market.”

    This is not an open market.  If this market was open, we’d all be making plenty.  We’re not.

    This is not a free country.

    You are not free when you don’t have your health.

    You are not free when you aren’t taught quality critical thinking skills. You can not be free if you can’t think clearly. You can’t think clearly if you’re surrounded by carefully crafted messaging with the direct purpose of keeping you stuck where you are and falling like you have been for decades.

    It would be easy and poetic to say that we’ve become so advertising-besotted that we can’t tell a real message from an ad anymore, but sometimes poetry doesn’t tell the story.  The reality is not that you are stupid.

    The reality is that you have been kept ignorant.  What you hear and see shapes what you believe, and no matter what your race, class, culture, identity, background, current status, that is the truth.

    There is a very small group of people who control what you hear and see for their own interests.  That is also the truth.  In much the same way it does not require a formal conspiracy for like interests to pursue like ends, it does not require traditional authoritarianism to keep at least enough people at heel to discourage the rest who aren’t from rising up in protest.

    One of the ways that works is through recursive authoritarianism.  So and so has this going on at worked that could be improved or has ethical considerations that concern you, but it’s clear that your best interest, and the company’s, is to simply not acknowledge that out loud. So you agree to say nothing and now whatever your position, you have to use it to ensure nobody else does either.  Authoritarianism.

    You are constantly at risk of losing your livelihood if you do the right thing ethically when you’re doing business.  I have been constantly paraphrasing a line from Robert Heinlein lately: the survival of the species is the only universal morality.

    Willful ignorance – the selfish pretense to stupidity

    A whole BUNCH of people are about to hit what a lot of people, including people like me, have lived with most or all of our lives. It is not going to be pretty.

    And where we are mostly not prepared is in our own minds and hearts to just admit that we have been wrong, and do something about it.

    You are watching everything change, right now. It is changing precisely because IT HAS TO.

    It’ll happen the easy way with good leadership – leadership that has consistently stood *against* all these abuses of power and resources, who has consistently worked in the best interests of *the people* and *the nation* and long-term sustainability and health and education and all the other things that go along with REAL freedom.

    This is not an acute problem. This is the predictable result of a systemic problem. We can face that, or we can KEEP trying to pretend “it can’t happen here, not to us, we’re good people, my deity wouldn’t do that to me, we’re just trying to [insert euphemism to rationalize all the ego-driven bullshit of this planet], we’re doing the right thing, all these people who want all these changes are just self-interested, I just want what’s best for me.”

    What’s best for all of us is to start working together instead of against each other. Abundance is everywhere. We have everything we need. We just refuse to let go of the things we don’t, because they’re comfortable.  Because of that, we’ve all become far LESS comfortable than if a few of us weren’t so obstinate about their comfort.

    The future is scary.  The unknown is scary.  The future is unknown.  What is known is that we are at a key point in human history when we can no longer continue to pretend and act at the game of political leadership.  We must lead, individually starting with ourselves, and in the world starting with a capable, competent, non-nonsense president who walks into the office with zero allegiance to anyone but the people who elected him.

    The global coronavirus pandemic absolutely must be dealt with in an immediate fashion, and it is – as much as the ham-handed boobs currently running the country can manage it.  But we absolutely must not ignore the lessons it brings, because frankly there will be more if we don’t re-prioritize IMMEDIATELY.  To simply deal with the immediate problem is to remain unprepared for the next one.

    Bernie Sanders understands that and is doing his best with a system that has been corrupted almost beyond repair.  Personally, I hope if he loses the Democratic nomination he chooses to move forward as a write-in candidate in any state where he can’t get on the ballot as an independent, immediately if he loses the Democratic primary, which *right now* it appears he may, but we’ll have to see what happens.  The concept of faithless electors exists, too.  We have no idea how the national conventions, which are traditionally where the nominations take place, will turn out yet.  A lot can change between now and then.  I think it would be a mistake to start running independently *before* the official things are officially official, unless they try to drag ass past the deadlines for indys or write-ins to get on ballots.

    But if they officially reject Sanders as a nominee…boy.  I just can’t see him as head of the Senate.  That’s not his job.  And the offer would have to be made – which would immediately break Biden’s campaign promise – and he’d have to accept, neither of which we know anything of right now.

  • The John Henry Show – S1E022 Biden-Sanders Debate

    The Biden-Sanders debate, the ongoing state of US coronavirus response, outrageous social media trolls (and the people who fall for them), and the nature of authority and expertise.  Video archive at https://youtu.be/xBaHGGnXLZ4

  • The John Henry Show S1E021 – Free-For-All Friday #4

    Usually on FFAF I try to stay away from the political and social stuff and stick to more personal, light-hearted, and not-the-news stuff, but this week there’s just no avoiding the discussion.  I’m afraid I got a little passionate on this one, so there’s more NSFW language than usual; I’ve taken the step of self-censoring to avoid dropping any f-bombs on you if you’re listening with the kids around.  Video archive at https://youtu.be/R4rYgAJNW0Y

     

  • The John Henry Show S1E020 – Fighting Back (Pt 2)

    Wrapping up the point-by-point discussion on deconstructing-combatting anti-Sanders rhetoric (and propaganda in general), plus thoughts on legitimate authority and expertise + more.  Video at https://youtu.be/w8X1PYH3xQY.  Companion article at http://passionate-cyan-owl.192-250-227-172.cpanel.site/combating-artificial-narratives-in-social-media-related-to-the-sanders-candidacy/

     

     

  • The John Henry Show S1E019 – Fighting Back (Part 1)

    This podcast is a little different.  It takes place in two parts, this is the first.  It comes with a companion article where I lay all this stuff down in writing.  You can view the video at https://youtu.be/wKVFRgcZwrQ